суббота, 3 марта 2012 г.

Solberg leads Rally of New Zealand

World Rally Championship leader Sebastian Loeb of France slid into a bridge on the fourth of nine stages on the opening day of Rally New Zealand, ending Friday 1 minute, 19.8 seconds off the lead held by Norway's Petter Solberg.

Six-time world champion Loeb, who won the past three rounds of the championship, approached a right-hand corner too fast on the 22.2km stage in Northland province and slammed sideways into a bridge abutment.

He was saved by a barrier from rolling down a steep embankment onto railway tracks and, in restarting his engine, started a small scrub fire.

Solberg, driving a privateer Citroen, ended the day 1.4 seconds ahead of …

пятница, 2 марта 2012 г.

Got Good Stocks? Prove it.

Got Good Stocks? Prove it.

It seems obvious - but one of the keys to successful investing is to do what works.

Do what works. And don't do what doesn't.

Class dismissed.

In all seriousness, the problem many investors find themselves in is how do you know what works and what doesn't.

This reminds me of an actual conversation I had with someone several years ago who was talking about a losing stock he was in.

Kevin:
- Why are you still in it if it keeps on going down?

Losing Stock Guy:
- I don't think it'll go much lower from here.


Kevin:

- Did you think it would go this low when you bought it?


Losing Stock Guy:

- No.

Kevin:

- Do you think it'll go up?

Losing Stock Guy:
- Eventually. But probably not right away. It may still go down some more.


Kevin:

- There are plenty of stocks going straight up. Why don't you get out of that one that keeps losing you money and get into a better one?

Losing Stock Guy:

- I don't know of any better stocks to get into.


Kevin:

- What if you did know of a better stock to get into, would you do it?


Losing Stock Guy:
- Yeah, ... but I'm not sure how to find 'better' stocks.

That last comment said it all.

He was in losing stocks because he didn't know how to pick better ones.

But if he had a proven, profitable, stock picking strategy, he could.

So How Do You Know if a Strategy Works or Not?


The answer is backtesting.

But first you need a way to pick stocks in the first place.

Don't be the guy who buys a stock because it was talked about on TV or because he heard a tip from a friend.

Start with a stock screener.

Even if you don't use a screener now, most people still do their own 'screening' one way or another. They may hear that a stock has a certain growth rate, a certain P/E ratio, sales surprise or whatever.

They then find themselves listening for or reading about or surfing the Internet -- for stocks that meet these criteria.

Well if you want to find stocks that meet certain criteria, you can find them quickly and easily with a stock screener.

But, just because you narrow down 10,000 stocks to only a handful, doesn't necessarily mean that you've picked the best stocks on the planet.

You might have picked the worst ones.

But with backtesting, you can then test your screen (i.e. stock picking ideas) to see how good (or bad) your screening strategy has performed in the past.

  • In other words, does your screening strategy generally find stocks that go up once they've been identified?
  • Or does your screen generally find stocks that get buried once they've been identified?
This is good stuff to know.

With backtesting, you can see how successful your stock picking strategy has performed in the past, so you'll have a better idea as to what your probability of success will be now, and in the future.

Of course, past performance is no guarantee of future results, but what else do you have to go by?

Think about it; if you saw that a stock picking strategy did nothing but lose money, year after year, period after period, stock after stock, over and over again, there's NO WAY you'd want to trade that strategy or use that screen to pick stocks with.

Why?

Because it's 'proven' that it picks bad stocks.

Sure, it may turn around and start picking winners all of a sudden -- but it may also continue to pick losing stocks the way it always has.

On the other hand...what if you saw a strategy that did great year after year, period after period, over and over again -- you'd of course want to trade that strategy.

Why?

Because it's proven to be a profitable trading strategy.

And while it may start picking losers all of a sudden (now that you're using it - right?), it may also continue to pick winning stocks, just like it had been doing over and over before.

Don't get me wrong, just because you have a great strategy for picking winning stocks, it isn't going to preclude you from ever having another losing trade. On the contrary, even some of the best strategies 'only' have win ratios of 65%, 70% or 80%. (NOT 100%.)

But if your strategy picks winners far more often than losers, once you find yourself in a losing trade, you can quickly cut your losses and feel confident that your next pick will have a high probability of succeeding.

For example: in the Research Wizard program that I use, we have a strategy that comes loaded with it called 'Big Money Zacks'. The backtested results of this screen from 2000 thru 2008 (using a 1-week holding period, sans commissions and fees) showed an average annual return of over 69.5%.

Even in the bear market of 2008, it showed an annual return of 15.3% compared to the market's -37.7%.

This year? 2009? YTD, through the month of June, this strategy is up 34.7% versus the S&P 500, which is flat, or 0%, for the year.

What kinds of stocks does it pick?

Take Pep Boys (PBY) for instance. They are in the Retail/Wholesale Auto Parts industry and are a leading automotive retail and service chain.

PBY is in one of the top Zacks Ranked industries (10 out of 217). And it is one of the stars of the group with triple-digit projected growth rates and astonishingly large upward earnings estimate revisions.

Here's another strategy that comes loaded with the program - 'R-Squared EPS Growth Rate'. This one is a more conservative styled strategy (smaller drawdowns), has a longer holding period (4 weeks) and has less turnover (trades less frequently). But between 2000 and 2008, the strategy produced an average annual return of 24.5%.

What about the bear of 2008? 14.2%. Right inline with its past results.

2009 so far? Up 27.4%. Even better than its past results already.

An example of a stock that comes through a strategy like this is Fossil, Inc. (FOSL). They are in the jewelry industry and design fashion watches and other accessories.

This industry is literally the top Zacks Ranked industry out of 217 industries. And FOSL is one of the top ranked stocks within that industry with a Zacks Rank of 1.

So, is one strategy better than the other? No. They're just different. And that's the beauty of testing different strategies on your own. Or creating your own strategies and testing them out.

Put your ideas to the test and find out how your strategies have done in the past. What are their returns? What's their risk/reward ratio? What can you expect to see? How do they do in bull markets? Or bear markets? Or even sideways markets? Learn what works and what doesn't before you place your next trade. And become a better investor today.

Stop guessing. Start backtesting. And know.

Thanks and good trading,
Kevin

Kevin is Zacks' chart patterns and stock screening expert. He's in charge of the Zacks Research Wizard that empowers investors to generate market-beating stock lists at the press of a button. This software directly connects you with our constantly updated database, so you can easily create your own screens and backtests, using proprietary Zacks Rank and hundreds of other criteria.

The Research Wizard also provides many built-in strategies that are proven winners in bear as well as bull markets. These include the celebrated "Big Money Zacks" that finds hot stocks on the move. Since 2001, it has averaged a staggering yearly gain of +72.1%.

You're invited to see the latest picks from these strategies. Click here for your Research Wizard free trial.


"PBY" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?
"FOSL" Free Stock Analysis: Buy? Sell? Hold?
Zacks Investment Research

Exelixis Delivers Additional Cancer Targets To Protein Design Labs.(Brief Article)

2001 DEC 25 - (NewsRx.com & NewsRx.net) -- Exelixis, Inc., has delivered five additional cancer antibody targets to Protein Design Labs, Inc., (PDL) in the companies' ongoing oncology collaboration.

The collaboration, signed in May 2001, utilizes Exelixis' expertise in target identification and validation to discover novel antibody targets, and PDL's proficiency in antibody clinical development and manufacturing to create humanized antibodies for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of cancer.

The targets delivered to and accepted by PDL have met a number of stringent criteria that Exelixis applies to all of its targets prior to initiating drug discovery. …

REP. STEARNS SPEAKING ON FCC REFORM AT FREE STATE FOUNDATION EVENT ON APRIL 12

WASHINGTON, April 11 -- Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla. (6th CD), issued the following news release:

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee's Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee, and a senior member on the Communications and Technology Subcommittee, will speak at The Free State Foundation event "Regulatory Reform at the FCC: Why Not Now?" on Tuesday, April 12, 2011. In the previous Congress, Stearns served as the Republican leader of the Communications, Technology and the Internet Subcommittee and he is a leader in promoting reform at the FCC. "I look forward on outlining my thoughts on reforming the FCC to make it more efficient, less burdensome, and a force in promoting economic growth," said Stearns. The event is scheduled for 11:45 - 2:00 PM at the Capital Visitors Center, Congressional Meeting Room North. For any query with respect to this article or any other content requirement, please contact Editor at htsyndication@hindustantimes.com

Paul Flusche, 202/225-5744.

UNBEATENS DON'T STAY THAT WAY.(SPORTS)

Byline: RICK GOSSELIN Dallas Morning News

Perfection in October is a rare feat for the New England Patriots, New York Jets and Philadelphia Eagles. They are the last of the NFL's unbeatens this season, all at 5-0.

In the last 25 years, the Patriots and Jets have never been the last team standing in October. And you'd have to go all the way back to 1981 to find the last time Philadelphia was the last of the NFL's unbeatens in a season. The Eagles will attempt to match that 6-0 start of 1981 when they visit the Cleveland Browns today.

The Miami Dolphins are the only team to play a perfect regular season in NFL history, posting a 14-0 record in 1972 on the way to their first Super Bowl championship.

The Denver Broncos came close in 1998, winning their first 13 games on the way to a 14-2 season. The 1985 Chicago Bears won their first 12 games on the way to a 15-1 season.

Of the 27 teams that carried unbeaten records deepest into each of the last 25 seasons, 17 saw their run at perfection end on the road. In addition to the Eagles, the Jets also are on the road this weekend visiting, ironically, the Patriots.

The best spoiler in the last 25 years has been the Colts, who have ended three perfect seasons. In 1980, playing out of Baltimore, the Colts ended Buffalo's 5-0 start. In the 1990s, playing out of Indianapolis, the Colts twice ended perfect starts by the Dolphins (at 6-0 in 1992 and 4-0 in 1995).

TV takes step into cyberspace

Television in the United States will take a tentative stepalong the information highway this morning with the launch of anambitious 24- hour news service operated jointly by the NBC networkand the computer systems behemoth, Microsoft Corp.

Formed from a $500m joint venture unveiled only seven monthsago, the new channel will attempt to challenge directly the primacyof Ted Turner's Cable Network News (CNN), which has had the fieldvirtually to itself in 24-hour news programming since itsfoundation 16 years ago.

The birth of the new service, to be known as MSNBC, is likely totrigger a fierce battle in the industry for news viewers globally.Rupert Murdoch's Fox television company is also preparing to jointhe fray with its own all-news channel later this summer. Similarplans were recently shelved by ABC, owned by Disney, because ofinflated costs.

MSNBC is attracting intense curiosity also because of itspromise to fuse traditional television viewing with the Internet.An interactive version of the cable news service will be carriedsimultaneously on a World Wide Web site managed by Microsoft(http://www.msnbc.com.). Viewers will be encouraged to refer to thesite for further details and context of individual news stories.

"Visionaries have said, 'Oh yes, some day the computer and thetelevision screen will come together,'" commented Mark Harrington,the general manager of MSNBC. "Well some day turns out to be 15July. What happens after that, we'll invent one day and one storyat a time."

Executives have rushed to introduce the service in time to catcha peak period of news in the United States, beginning with theOlympic Games, which open in Atlanta next weekend, and the finalstretches of the presidential campaign, which culminates with theelection itself in November. President Bill Clinton is to betonight's inaugural guest on Internight, an interview programme tobe put out daily in evening prime time.

There will be nothing coy about MSNBC's determination to take onCNN, meanwhile. Several weeks ago, a giant billboard advertisingthe new venture was posted across the road from CNN's headquartersin Atlanta bearing the cheeky message: "The future of cable newsfrom the people you know."

As its primary weapon, MSNBC has at its disposal not only NBC's1,200- strong corps of journalists but also the network's mostfamous household names. Among these is NBC's veteran evening newsreader, Tom Brokaw, who will conduct the interview with Mr Clinton.

CNN, meanwhile, has the advantage a world-wide brand identityfor delivering round-the-clock news. Crucially, it also has acommanding presence on America's overcrowded cable distributionsystems, with access to some 65 million US homes. To make way forthe MSNBC, NBC is being forced to close down "America's Talking",an all-talk cable channel it launched two years ago. That service,however, has only made inroads into 16 million homes.

Finding space on cable is also a critical challenge for Fox.Rupert Murdoch recently offered cable operators $10 as a cashincentive for every viewer given access to his putative all-newsservice. It was that manoeuvre that persuaded ABC to throw in thetowel. Even more strikingly, Mr Murdoch also last month offeredTelecommunications Inc (TCI), America's largest cable operator, a10 per cent stake in his new service in return for a guarantee thatit would be automatically offered to TCI customers.

A danger for MSNBC, meanwhile, is that its launch may be comingtoo soon for the interactive side to be fully developed, whichcould lead to disappointment for users of the web. Technology thatwould allow full video of the cable news service to be played onthe web is barely available yet and critics point out that CNNalready has several web sites of its own. NBC executives predict,none the less, that within a few years more people will beaccessing MSNBC by computer than on their televisions.

Professor gets computing's `Nobel' ; Harvard's Leslie Valiant wins A.M. Turing Award

Harvard University professor Leslie G. Valiant, a pioneer in thefield of artificial intelligence, has been awarded the 2010 A.M.Turing Award, the most prestigious prize in the field of computerscience. Valiant's research into processes to make computers reasonas humans do laid the groundwork for applications ranging from e-mail spam filters to IBM's Watson computer system, which last monthbested human competitors on the game show "Jeopardy!"

Known in computing circles as the "Nobel Prize in Computing," theaward is bestowed by a scientific society, the Association forComputing Machinery, and includes a $250,000 cash prize funded byIntel Corp. and Google Inc.

The prize is named for Alan Turing, a British mathematician andcode breaker during World War II who is known as a father of moderncomputer science.

"This connection with the achievements of the previous winners,and of Turing himself, is more than anyone in my field canreasonably expect," Valiant wrote in an e-mail.

He will receive the award on June 4, at the association's annualawards banquet in San Jose, Calif.

"I think Les Valiant's award is one of the strongest TuringAwards ever," said Jennifer Chayes, a member of the selectioncommittee and the managing director of Microsoft Research NewEngland. "His work is absolutely amazing."

As an example, Chayes cited Valiant's 1984 paper "A Theory ofthe Learnable" as a landmark in the field, saying it led to theprocesses that allow computers to discern which e-mail messages areviewed as annoying, and which Web search results are most relevant.

"All of the personalization that we are seeing is due to thecomputer learning from what you did, and trying to find patterns inwhat you did," Chayes said. "That is absolutely an application ofhis research."

Valiant's work has "an adventurous aspect," said Jon Kleinberg, aCornell University computer science professor who endorsed theHarvard professor's nomination for the award.

"He takes on questions that are fundamental, but very hard toattack, like how do intelligent agents learn? Or how does the braincompute?" Kleinberg said.

The science of machine learning, the type of artificialintelligence work Valiant helped to pioneer, develops the tools bywhich computers can solve problems on their own rather than rely onpreprogrammed answers, Kleinberg explained. One real-worldapplication is speech-recognition software, he added.

"Machine learning has allowed computers to display that samelevel of subtlety and complexity, the way that humans do when theysolve problems," Kleinberg said. "You pick up the phone and call anairline, it's almost impossible to get a human being. You're talkingto computers."

Valiant's win brings the prize to Cambridge for the second timein three years. A Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor,Barbara Liskov, won in 2008. She was recognized for the developmentof object-oriented programming, a method used to write most of thesoftware programs that power personal computers and the Internet.

Calvin Hennick can be reached at calvinhennick@yahoo.com.

09turing.ART